‘Cuts cost lives’ – firefighters rally to keep Rhyl station open 24/7

Rhyl and Deeside’s fire stations both face being closed at night as part of cuts to North Wales Fire and Rescue Service, which plans to improve emergency cover in rural areas such as Corwen, Dolgellau and Porthmadog.

Following months of campaigning led by the Fire Brigades Union (FBU), the North Wales Fire and Rescue Authority has dropped two of three proposals for cuts to North Wales.

But firefighters warn that the remaining proposal (option one) will impact their ability to keep people and homes safe in two of the region’s busiest areas, as well as decreasing capacity across North Wales at night.

Firefighters want to see the Rhyl station remain open 24/7 (Image: Newsquest)

READ MORE:

Firefighter launches petition to ensure Rhyl station stays open 24/7

Fears raised that Rhyl fire station still faces ‘serious downgrading’

Protest to be held at Rhyl fire station amid fears of downgrading

The FBU has proposed an “option four” which, it says, is “cost-neutral”, meets the objectives set out in the service’s consultation, still improves rural fire cover, and won’t drive part-time workers out of their stations.

A decision on these plans will be made at a fire authority meeting on December 18, with any changes agreed then to be enforced in a phased approach from April 2024 onwards.

Helen, a firefighter who has been based at the Rhyl station for 18 years, said the proposals have had an “absolutely shocking” effect on staff morale.

She said: “People can’t believe it, or the way it’s been done. The authority should have come to the employees and said: ‘Work with us, let’s try and put together an option that suits everybody’.

Deeside Fire Station is also under threat (Image: Newsquest)

“But that never happened, which has left a sour taste. It’s not been collaborative from the start.

“Through the FBU, we’ve brought another option that makes more sense.

“At night time, they’ll rely on on-call staff, so response times would increase, but also, resources would reduce, so there would just be more of a risk.

“24 hours a day, 365 days a year, there is a crew here of at least five who will, within 90 seconds, be out of the door. The longer we take to get to a fire, the likelier a bad outcome is.

“Saying the cover for the area is more equitable is all very well, but the risks aren’t equitable. You’re not spreading the cover relative to where the biggest risks are.

“At the moment, option four is the best we can do that meets their agenda, and is less impactful on the crews here already.

“It keeps full cover at Deeside and Rhyl, and gives an extra bit of a resource which is more flexible and mobile.”

Patsy Cash-Deakin was, along with several relatives, the victim of a house fire in Rhyl one evening in July 2022.

Patsy Cash-Deakin (right) with her daughter, Amelia (Image: Newsquest)

She also urged option one to be discarded, saying that, without a 24/7 service in Rhyl, the fire at her home could have proved fatal.

“Four of them were trapped in the house – my grandchildren, my son, and my son-in-law,” Patsy said.

“It happened at 9.56pm – at that time, this station would be closed if the projected plans are implemented.

“My grandchildren are only alive now because of these firefighters. If they go with option one and it happens again at that time, they would die.

“For the sake of saving £200,000, that’s £50,000 per life. My grandchildren, son, and son-in-law are worth more than that.”

Gavin Roberts, crew manager at the Rhyl fire station, warned that “cuts do cost lives”.

Gavin Roberts, crew manager at Rhyl Fire Station (Image: Newsquest)

He said downgrading Rhyl’s station could cause delays of up to eight to 10 minutes, in scenarios where “every second counts”.

A petition he started can also be signed at: petitions.senedd.wales/petitions/245542.

Gavin is a representative for the FBU, and has set up a Facebook page for his campaign, entitled “Save Rhyl Fire Station”.

He added: "I think option four is still what the authority and the service both ultimately want, and gives greater cover for the whole area.

“My message to the authority is for them to listen to all of the members of the public who have signed petitions, who are saying that they don’t want the downgrading of stations in busy areas just to improve fire cover in rural areas.”

Tom Weston has been a watch manager at the Rhyl station for two years.

Tom Weston (Image: Newsquest)

He added: “We believe option four meets all of the criteria and objectives set out in the consultation, without downgrading Rhyl and Deeside from a 24-hour model.

“We want the authority to listen to the firefighters and work with us. Then, we could possibly trial option four for a year. If it doesn’t work, we can then look at it again, but we think it will.

“They have listened to us, but it’s whether they take on board what we’re saying – we hope they do. They need to include the union as much as they can.

“We know our areas and our services the best, and we believe option four can do everything they need, but keep our gold standard cover in Rhyl and Deeside as well.”

Matt Wrack, FBU general secretary, said: “Fire services are already severely overstretched and under-resourced.

“Fire authorities should be doing everything in their power to invest in their fire service.

“Our fire services must be fit to face the threats of the future and the climate emergency. Instead, communities in North Wales are facing a dangerous downgrading of their protections from fire.

“Firefighters and the public have fought an inspiring campaign against these cuts, opposing them every step of the way across North Wales.

“The fire authority must listen and save Rhyl and Deeside fire stations.”

Duncan Stewart-Ball, FBU Wales regional secretary, added: “Our fire services must have the resources they need to keep lives and homes safe.

“The threat of downgrading Rhyl and Deeside fire stations presents a danger to public and firefighter safety across the whole of North Wales. 

“Closing these stations at night would put a huge strain on an already overstretched service.

“It would mean longer response times and fewer firefighters available to protect some of the busiest areas, where over 75,000 people are protected.

“This will impact everyone in North Wales. We will not sit back and allow this calamitous proposal to become a dangerous reality.”

North Wales Fire and Rescue Service deputy chief, Stewart Forshaw, said: “First and foremost, our primary aim is to work with fire authority members to protect the people of North Wales and ensure we provide the best level of emergency cover across the whole of the region.

“It’s important that we look at the whole picture and try to ensure any specific issues within particular communities do not have a disproportionate influence on the ultimate decision on the future of emergency cover across North Wales.

“Our recent public consultation was aimed at addressing where we could improve our service and achieve more equitable cover.

“Overwhelmingly, the response indicated that our ‘option one’ was the preferred option, which does not result in any loss of jobs and achieves everything we set out to address.

“It’s important that we take account of all viewpoints and all the information available so that our fire authority members are able to confidently make a fair and balanced final decision.

“We have been working with the FBU during the consultation and they have also attended our fire authority working group meetings to present their ideas.

“No decision on the chosen way forward in providing emergency cover will be made until our fire authority meets to consider the options on December 18.”